Training to perform suicide attacks case

Concerning Mr. A.H.J vs Denmark for violation of article 6 or 7, 13, and 26 of CCPR. The author’s original asylum motive was that he feared being killed by the Taliban if returned to Afghanistan. He had been abducted and detained by three people linked to the Taliban, as the Taliban wanted to train the […]

  • Decision: 15. June 2017
Human Rights
CCPR 2349/2014

Reopened case- member of FNL party

Concerning Ms. M.E.N. vs. Denmark violation of CEDAW article 2 (d), 12 and 15. The applicant was born on 1 July 1988 in Burundi. The author is a Burundian national, an ethnic Hutu and a Protestant. In 2008, she became a member of the party FNL, the opposition party to the government in Burundi, as […]

  • Decision: 6. February 2017
Gender
CEDAW 72/2014

The christian witness case

The applicant Mr. Z.S is an ethnic Ghazalbash from Kabul, Afghanistan. The applicant fears commander T and his supervisor, commander S because commander T killed the author’s father and took the family land. The applicant fled to Denmark and applied for asylum. The applicant was rejected by the refugee board and thus the case was […]

  • Decision: 28. September 2016
Human Rights
CCPR 2352/2014

Minor seeking asylum with his brother

Concerning Z.S. and M.S. vs. Denmark – violations of art. 6, 7, 13, 14 and 26 of CCPR: Denmark was filed an initial complain against a deportation order to him and his younger brothers country of origin, Afghanistan, December 12 2014 by the Danish Refugee Appeal Board in violation of CCPR article 6 , 7, […]

  • Decision: 11. August 2016
Human Rights
CCPR 2488/2014

Dublin Deportation to Bulgaria 5

This Communication is a complaint about the deportation of the author to another European Country according to the so-called “Dublin rules”. Since the Danish authorities decided to stop the deportation and allow the asylum application of the author to be processed in Denmark, this Communication was then discontinued.

  • Decision: 11. August 2016
Human Rights
CCPR 2571/2015

Dublin Deportation to Italy 3

This Communication is a complaint about the deportation of the author to another European Country according to the so-called “Dublin rules”. Since the Danish authorities decided to stop the deportation and allow the asylum application of the author to be processed in Denmark, this Communication was then discontinued.

  • Decision: 11. August 2016
Human Rights
CCPR 2516/2014

Dublin Deportation to Bulgaria 4

This Communication is a complaint about the deportation of the author to another European Country according to the so-called “Dublin rules”. Since the Danish authorities decided to stop the deportation and allow the asylum application of the author to be processed in Denmark, this Communication was then discontinued.

  • Decision: 11. August 2016
Human Rights
CCPR 2513/2014

Dublin Deportation to Bulgaria 3

This Communication is a complaint about the deportation of the author to another European Country according to the so-called “Dublin rules”. Since the Danish authorities decided to stop the deportation and allow the asylum application of the author to be processed in Denmark, this Communication was then discontinued.

  • Decision: 11. August 2016
Human Rights
CCPR 2506/2014

Dublin Deportation to Bulgaria 2

This Communication is a complaint about the deportation of the author to another European Country according to the so-called “Dublin rules”. Since the Danish authorities decided to stop the deportation and allow the asylum application of the author to be processed in Denmark, this Communication was then discontinued.

  • Decision: 10. August 2016
Human Rights
CCPR 2447/2014

Afghanistan Hazara Conversion

Concerning E. A. vs. Denmark – Violation of article 6 and 7 of CCPR: Denmark was filed an initial complain against a deportation order to the complainant’s country of origin, Afghanistan, December 16, 2013 by the Danish Refugees Appeal Board in violation of CCPR article 6 and/or 7, as well as article 14 and 18 […]

  • Decision: 30. December 2015
Human Rights
CCPR 2320/2013

The Urgent Deportation case

The applicant is ethnically a Hazara Shia Muslim, born in Afghanistan. During the Day of Ashoura in 2005, a special Shia religious day, the applicant helped the events by, for example, showing people where to sit in the Mosque. During the event, the Mosque was attacked by Sunni Muslims including a prominent commander. The applicant […]

  • Decision: 30. December 2015
Human Rights
CCPR 2605/2015

Dublin Deportation to Italy 2

This Communication is a complaint about the deportation of the author to another European Country according to the so-called “Dublin rules”. Since the Danish authorities decided to stop the deportation and allow the asylum application of the author to be processed in Denmark, this Communication was then discontinued.

  • Decision: 30. December 2015
Human Rights
CCPR 2553/2015

Dublin Deportation to Bulgaria 1

This Communication is a complaint about the deportation of the author to another European Country according to the so-called “Dublin rules”. Since the Danish authorities decided to stop the deportation and allow the asylum application of the author to be processed in Denmark, this Communication was then discontinued.

  • Decision: 30. December 2015
Human Rights
CCPR 2514/2014

Dublin Deportation to Italy 1

This Communication is a complaint about the deportation of the author to another European Country according to the so-called “Dublin rules”. Since the Danish authorities decided to stop the deportation and allow the asylum application of the author to be processed in Denmark, this Communication was then discontinued.

  • Decision: 30. December 2015
Human Rights
CCPR 2492/2014

Schizophrenia, post traumatic stress and paranoid psychosis case

Concerning J.H.Z (represented by Helle Holm Thomsen) vs. Denmark. The author was applying for Danish nationality, but due to his disability (suffering from Schizophrenia, post traumatic stress and paranoid psychosis) he was not able to pass a language test. Since he was not able to get dispensation from Danish authorities he complaint to the Human […]

  • Decision: 19. May 2015
Human Rights
CCPR 1951/2010

W vs. Denmark PTSD case

Concerning W vs. Denmark. The author was applying for Danish nationality, but due to his disability (suffering from Post Traumatisk stress) he was not able to pass a language test. Since he was not able to get dispensation from Danish authorities he complaint to the Human Rights Committee in 2011. When new rules were introduced […]

  • Decision: 19. May 2015
Human Rights
CCPR 2045/2011

A vs. Denmark PTSD case

Concerning A vs. Denmark The author was applying for Danish nationality, but due to his disability (suffering from Post Traumatisk stress) he was not able to pass a language test. Since he was not able to get dispensation from Danish authorities he complaint to the Human Rights Committee in 2010. When new rules were introduced […]

  • Decision: 19. May 2015
Human Rights
CCPR 2012/2010

Eritrean Woman Torture Case

Concerning S.A. vs. Denmark violation of art 3 of CAT and art. 7 of CCPR: Denmark was filed an initial complaint against a deportation order, dated 29 March 2010, set by the Danish Refugee Board in violation of CCPR article 7 and especially CAT article 3. Even though it is a standard procedure to ask […]

Torture
CAT No. 460/2011

Afghanistan Tadjik Conversion

Concerning Z.S. vs. Denmark violation of article 6 or 7 of CCPR.: Denmark was filed an initial complaint against a deportation order, dated 26 September 2011, set by the Danish Refugee Board in violation of CCPR article 6 and 7. It was also asked for urgent measures as the client was set to an immediately […]

  • Decision: 18. November 2014
Human Rights
CCPR 2286/2013

Political Persecution of Kurdish man in Syria

Concerning A. O. vs. Denmark – violations of art 3 of CAT and art. 7 of CCPR: Denmark was filed an initial complaint against a deportation order, dated October the 20, 2011, set by the Danish Refugee Board, and the author risks to be forced deportation to his country of origin Syria, as from October […]

  • Decision: 7. November 2014
Torture
CAT 484/2011

Mistreated in military case

This case concerns an Eritrean man who served in the Eritrean military. In Eritrea the military service is by law set to be 1 ½ years, however after this period he was forced to stay in the army for another 10 years. The applicant attempted to desert, but was arrested and accused of working against […]

  • Decision: 24. June 2014
Torture
CAT 502/2012

The Mixed couple case

The case concerned a Pakistani couple and their child. The couple fled Pakistan due to fear of persecution since the male applicant is Christian while the female is born a Muslim but later converted to Christianity. The Refugee Board rejected the application by decision of July 2012. The case was subsequently referred to the CCPR […]

  • Decision: 6. November 2013
Human Rights
CCPR 2194/2012

The Pental Costa movement case

Concerning Ms. F.G vs Denmark for violation of articles 2,7,9,10,18 and 27 of CCPR. The author is a citizen of Eritrea but she lived in Ethiopia for two years before coming to Denmark in order to seek international protection. She is a member of a religious minority- the Pental Costa movement- a group of christians […]

Human Rights
CCPR 2023/2011